GAP

Japanese Government sets gold standard for human rights

Japanese Government sets gold standard for human rights

The Japanese Government have embraced human rights by allowing its citizens to make their own well informed choices when it comes to the COVID-19 vaccine. They will not be forcing or coercing citizens, and they have asked others to respect peoples individual medical choices by not discriminating.

The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is a cabinet level ministry of the Japanese government. On their website under COVID-19 vaccine information, it states the following:

Consent to vaccination

Although we encourage all citizens to receive the COVID-19 vaccination, it is not compulsory or mandatory. Vaccination will be given only with the consent of the person to be vaccinated after the information provided. Please get vaccinated of your own decision, understanding both the effectiveness in preventing infectious diseases and the risk of side effects. No vaccination will be given without consent. Please do not force anyone in your workplace or those who around you to be vaccinated, and do not discriminate against those who have not been vaccinated.

Historically, Australia’s most notorious human rights abusers – both Federal and State Governments – are continuing to strip people of their jobs, lives, families, freedom, rights, wealth, home and basically anything they can use to coerce people into taking the vaccine.

Posted by GAP in Covid, Legal

Does a “Vote of No Confidence” (VONC) work?

Does a “Vote of No Confidence” (VONC) work?

Does a “Vote of No Confidence” (VONC) work where an elector crosses out every candidate on the ballot paper, and then writes “no suitable candidate to follow my will”?

No! Voting VONC is informal and won’t be counted.

The claim that voting VONC would “sack the parliament” is completely unfound. There is no provision, no law, and no instruction that backs this claim up whatsoever.

It serves to only strip minor parties from votes, because those who would consider voting VONC are not Labor/Liberal voters in the first place, effectively helping the major parties win.

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) have written a response to such a question:

The AEC can confirm this information is incorrect. A vote like this (i.e. where a line is drawn through each candidate’s name and ‘no suitable candidate to meet my will’ written on the ballot paper) is an informal vote and therefore not included in the count. (1 of 4)

Furthermore, the information about no confidence in any candidate resulting in a new election has no basis in law either under the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 or the Constitution. (2 of 4)

Even if 51 per cent of the population vote this way (which is highly unlikely), it is irrelevant. (3 of 4)

These votes will be informal and not included in the count. They cannot lead to the sacking of the parliament. (4 of 4)

Furthermore, in May of 2019, a request was made to the AEC under the Freedom of Information Act 1982, for documents relating to comments on a “Vote of No Confidence”. The lawyer for the AEC stated that no such documents existed, and therefore denied the request.

A vote for a minor party goes against the major parties, diluting their votes. Minor parties need your vote, so please don’t waste it.

Posted by GAP in Constitution

FDA wants until 2076 to release vaccine data records

FDA wants until 2076 to release vaccine data records

International news organisation Reuters has revealed that a group of scientists asked the US Federal Government to share the data that it relied upon in licensing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, but the scientists never imagined it would take 55 years.

That’s how long the Food & Drug Administration proposes it should be given to review and release the trove of vaccine-related documents responsive to the request. Justice Department lawyers representing the FDA note in court papers that the plaintiffs are seeking a huge amount of vaccine-related material – about 329,000 pages.

The plaintiffs, a group of more than 30 professors and scientists from universities including Yale, Harvard, UCLA and Brown, filed suit in September in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, seeking expedited access to the records. They say that releasing the information could help reassure vaccine skeptics that the shot is indeed “safe and effective and, thus, increase confidence in the Pfizer vaccine.”

The US Food and Drug Administration agency want until the year 2076 to release documents that only took 108 days to review. Given the large number of vaccine hesitant people out there, wouldn’t the FDA and Pfizer want the world to know just how thorough their testing was?

But no, rather than be fully transparent, the FDA are dragging it out over 55 years. This is for a company that has been sued for billions over deadly drug tests in which children were either killed or deformed. This is for a company that has been fined billions of dollars for dodgy practices in the past. And this very same drug is being mandated onto workers and pushed onto our children!

By concealing and refusing to investigate the impact of Pfizer vaccines in greater detail, politicians and Health officials are being criminally negligent.

Posted by GAP in Covid

Dave Oneegs chats with Rod Culleton

Dave Oneegs chats with Rod Culleton

“Culleton unloads and drops one of the biggest truth bombs of the year!” ~ Dave Oneegs

Dave Oneegs chats with Rod Culleton about the plan to restore the Commonwealth and the Constitution for the people.

Posted by GAP in Constitution

Can you use a pen to mark your ballot paper when voting?

Can you use a pen to mark your ballot paper when voting?

Question: Can you use a pen to mark your ballot paper when voting?

Answer: Yes you can, and we encourage you to do so.

Section 206 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 states that all voters must be supplied with a pencil when voting in a polling booth, but there’s nothing preventing you from bringing your own pen and using it instead.

Posted by GAP in Legal

Jason Miles interviews former senators Rod Culleton and Darren Dickson

Jason Miles interviews former senators Rod Culleton and Darren Dickson

Great Australian Party senate candidate, Jason Miles interviews former senator, Rod Culleton and his head of constitutional research, Darren Dickson on the states ongoing jab mandates.

Posted by GAP in Constitution

Pete Evans interviews Rod Culleton and Neil Piccinin

Pete Evans interviews Rod Culleton and Neil Piccinin

Chef Pete Evans interviews Former Senator, Rod Culleton and his constitutional researcher, Neil Piccinin about how the termination of the Commonwealth was known to the Australian Government, and continue to deceive people.

Posted by GAP in Constitution

Jason Miles interviews former senators Rod Culleton and Len Harris

Jason Miles interviews former senators Rod Culleton and Len Harris

The Former senators Rod Culleton and Len Harris discuss the constitutional crisis facing us today at both levels of government, in particular state.

Posted by GAP in Constitution